Traumatic Stress Disorder (TSD)
A Proposed Paradigm Shift from Pathology to Survival Governance
Complete TSD Framework
Diagnostic criteria, staging model, neurobiological map, treatment protocols, and the Internal Kingdom framework
A. Diagnostic Features
The essential feature of TSD is the persistent maintenance of a neurobiological and psychological survival-state, long after the originating threat has passed. The individual's system does not recognize the threat as "post," but operates as if it is ongoing. This leads to a fundamental reorganization of the self, characterized by the dominance of a Survival Self—a coherent psychological and biological entity that governs perception, affect, and behavior according to the immutable laws of the past traumatic event. The individual's Core Self (the pre-traumatic or innate self) becomes subordinate, exiled, or inaccessible.
B. Diagnostic Criteria
1. Altered Sovereignty
A pervasive sense that the self is not the primary agent of one's life. The individual feels "ruled by" a reactive, protective, or numb internal force (the Survival Self).
2. Neurobiological Recalibration
Persistent dysregulation: hyper-arousal (threat scanning, irritability), hypo-arousal (shutdown, numbness), or oscillation between states.
3. Somatic Dominion
Visceral reliving—emotions as overwhelming physical events. The "Unfinished Gesture"—trapped survival impulses seeking discharge.
4. Temporal Collapse
The past is re-lived (not remembered) in the present. The future is seen as a predictable extension of past threat.
C. Staging & Survival Patterns
Staging
- PreTSD: Vulnerable, sensitized system
- TSD (Active): Survival Self governs
- PostTSD (Integration): Core Self restored, Survival Self as advisor
Survival Adaptation Types
- Abandoned Monarchy (Borderline): Fear of abandonment drives frantic avoidance
- Fortress City-State (Narcissistic): Grandiosity defends against shame
- Predatory Fiefdom (Antisocial): Disregard for others as defense against predation
- Theatrical Court (Histrionic): Attention-seeking prevents invisibility
D. Associated Features Supporting Diagnosis
- • Impaired capacity for self-reflection
- • Relationships characterized by cycles of enmeshment and withdrawal
- • A history of being perceived as "treatment-resistant"
- • Profound feeling of emptiness or inner void when Survival Self activity subsides
E. Prevalence
Data is not yet available under this proposed framework. It is hypothesized that TSD would capture a significant portion of individuals currently diagnosed with PTSD, Complex PTSD, and Borderline, Narcissistic, Antisocial, and Histrionic Personality Disorders.
F. Development and Course
Onset can follow any event perceived by the nervous system as threatening to life or psychological integrity. The Survival Self consolidates power instantaneously or gradually, depending on the nature, duration, and developmental stage of the trauma. The course is chronic and pervasive if untreated, as the Survival Self's strategies are self-reinforcing. Individuals may present for treatment not for "trauma," but for chronic anxiety, depression, relationship instability, or unexplained medical symptoms.
G. Risk & Prognostic Factors
Risk Factors
- • Early developmental trauma or attachment disruption
- • Pre-existing neurobiological vulnerability (e.g., high anxiety sensitivity)
- • Severity, duration, and proximity of the traumatic event
Prognostic Factors
Positive prognostic factors include: the individual's capacity to form a therapeutic alliance ("Provisional Government"), access to somatic and parts-based therapies, and the development of mentalization skills. The "In Integration" specifier is the benchmark for successful treatment.
J. Functional Consequences
TSD impairs functioning across all domains:
- Occupational: Inability to tolerate stress, authority figures (perceived as threats), or the perceived confinement of a workplace
- Social: Relationships are experienced as unsafe, leading to instability, conflict, or isolation
- Physical: Chronic health conditions related to a perpetually activated stress-response system (e.g., cardiovascular issues, autoimmune dysregulation, fibromyalgia)
K. Differential Diagnosis
L. Comorbidity
TSD is often comorbid with:
- • Depressive Disorders
- • Substance Use Disorders (as a form of self-medication)
- • Somatic Symptom Disorders
- • Eating Disorders
M. Assessment and Treatment Implications
Assessment must be somatic and narrative
Clinical Interview: Focus on the "laws of the internal kingdom."
- • "What part of you is making that decision?"
- • "Where do you feel that in your body?"
- • "If that feeling had a message, what would it be?"
Treatment is a Political Process, Not a Medical One
The therapeutic alliance becomes a temporary provisional government, supporting the Core Self to regain its sovereignty.
First-Line Modalities
- Somatic Experiencing® / Sensorimotor Psychotherapy: To gently discharge trapped survival energy and complete the "Unfinished Gesture"
- Internal Family Systems (IFS) Therapy: To directly work with the Survival Self as a "protector part" and access the exiled Core Self
- Neurofeedback: To directly recalibrate the dysregulated nervous system
- Pharmacotherapy: May be used as a supportive measure to reduce autonomic intensity, making the psychological and somatic work possible, but it is not a cure for the underlying structural conflict
The goal of treatment is not the eradication of the Survival Self, but its integration as a respected advisor to a sovereign Core Self, leading to a state of PostTSD (Integration).
TSD ↔ Bipolar Disorder: Clinical & Economic Crosswalk
The $280 Billion Problem
F31.9 - Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified costs the U.S. healthcare system an estimated $280 billion annually. Yet this single "unspecified" diagnosis code tells us virtually nothing about what's actually happening in the patient's nervous system, why traditional treatments often fail, or how to treat it effectively.
The TSD Reframe: Bipolar as Survival Constitution
Many individuals diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder (particularly F31.9 Unspecified) may be manifesting TSD with Oscillating Survival States—not an endogenous mood disorder, but a neurobiological survival strategy in response to unprocessed trauma.
Clinical Crosswalk Table
Manic Episode
TSD Reinterpretation: Acute hyper-arousal survival state. The system floods with energy to "fight" or "flee" a perceived ongoing threat.
Therapeutic Implication: Not a disease state to suppress, but trapped survival energy seeking discharge. Somatic completion, not just mood stabilization.
Depressive Episode
TSD Reinterpretation: Hypo-arousal survival state: Shutdown, conservation mode. The system "plays dead" or goes numb after prolonged activation.
Therapeutic Implication: Not chemical imbalance alone, but nervous system exhaustion.Nervous system recalibration, not just antidepressants.
Rapid Cycling
TSD Reinterpretation: Oscillation between hyper- and hypo-arousal. The Survival Self cannot settle into a stable governance structure.
Therapeutic Implication: Evidence of ongoing internal conflict between Survival Self strategies.Parts work to negotiate peace treaty.
Mixed Episodes
TSD Reinterpretation: Simultaneous hyper- and hypo-arousal: "wired but frozen." The system is both activated (threat present) and shutdown (threat overwhelming).
Therapeutic Implication: The "Unfinished Gesture" in its most acute form.Somatic discharge critical.
Psychotic Features
TSD Reinterpretation: Temporal Collapse so severe that past threat imagery intrudes into present perception. Flashback content interpreted as delusion.
Therapeutic Implication: Not primary psychosis, but trauma-based perceptual distortion.Trauma processing, not just antipsychotics.
Bipolar I (F31.0-F31.9) Meets TSD Criteria
• Bipolar patients frequently describe feeling "taken over" by mania or depression
• "I wasn't myself" = Core Self exiled, Survival Self governing
• Mania = Hyper-arousal
• Depression = Hypo-arousal
• Rapid cycling = Oscillation between states
• This is the hallmark of TSD
• "Crashing" after mania = visceral exhaustion
• Psychomotor agitation = "wired but trapped"
• The body is not just expressing mood; it's enacting survival
• Manic grandiosity often involves fantasies of rewriting past failures
• Depressive rumination = being trapped in the past
• Future catastrophizing in both states
The F31.9 Crisis: Why "Unspecified" is a Red Flag
"Bipolar Disorder, Unspecified" is assigned when:
- The patient has bipolar symptoms but doesn't fit clean criteria for Type I or II
- The clinician can't determine which type
- The presentation is atypical or confusing
- It's a clinical shrug
Why This Matters: F31.9 represents diagnostic uncertainty, yet we treat it as if it's a known entity. Patients get mood stabilizers without understanding what we're stabilizing. Treatments fail, patients are labeled "treatment-resistant." The underlying trauma is never addressed.$280 billion spent on symptom management, not root cause.
Current Bipolar Treatment (F31.9)
- Mood stabilizers (lithium, valproate)
- Antipsychotics (if psychotic features)
- Antidepressants (cautiously)
- Psychotherapy (often CBT, supportive)
Goal: Suppress symptoms, prevent episodes
Success Rate: Only 40-60% achieve sustained remission. High medication non-compliance. Frequent relapses.
TSD Treatment Protocol (309.89)
- Somatic Experiencing® - Discharge trapped activation/shutdown
- Internal Family Systems - Work with "manic part" and "depressed part" as Survival Selves
- Neurofeedback - Retrain oscillating nervous system
- Provisional Government Therapy - Restore Core Self sovereignty
- Pharmacotherapy as bridge - Not cure, but support during integration
Goal: Integrate Survival Selves, restore sovereignty, achieve PostTSD state
Hypothesis: Higher sustained remission, lower relapse, patients understand why they cycle
Economic Implications
Current State: F31.9
- $280 billion/year in U.S. healthcare costs
- Lifetime treatment costs per patient: $250,000+
- Lost productivity: Immeasurable
- No clear etiological model = endless symptom management
TSD Reframe Potential
If even 20% of F31.9 cases are actually TSD with trauma-based oscillation:
- $56 billion in potentially misdirected treatment
- Patients could be treated with trauma-focused, somatic modalities instead of lifelong mood stabilizers
- Potential for PostTSD integration (not just symptom management)
What This Means: More accurate diagnosis = more effective treatment. Reduced medication burden. Lower lifetime costs. Higher quality of life. Paradigm shift from "chronic mental illness" to "survivable and integrable trauma response."
Proposed Diagnostic Pathway for DSM-6
Step 1: Patient presents with mood instability, cycling, energy dysregulation
Step 2: Assess for trauma history and TSD criteria
• If trauma present + meets TSD criteria → 309.89 TSD with Oscillating Survival States
• If no clear trauma + endogenous presentation → F31.x Bipolar Disorder
Step 3: TSD patients receive trauma-focused, somatic, sovereignty-restoration treatment first
Step 4: Only if TSD treatment fails, consider endogenous bipolar diagnosis
Proposed Code:
309.89 (F43.9) - Traumatic Stress Disorder, Specify if: With Oscillating Survival States (Bipolar Pattern)
This single reclassification could reshape psychiatric treatment and save billions.
For Clinicians: Assessment Questions
If you have a patient with F31.9, ask:
- "What was happening in your life before your first manic/depressive episode?"
Look for trauma, loss, threat - "When you're manic, what does your body feel like it's trying to do?"
Fight? Flee? Secure connection? - "When you're depressed, what does your body feel like it's trying to do?"
Hide? Shut down? Disappear? - "Who feels in charge during a manic episode? During depression?"
Assess for Survival Self governance
If the answers point to survival strategies, consider TSD assessment before defaulting to chronic bipolar management.
Key Takeaway
F31.9 is a $280 billion diagnostic placeholder.
TSD offers a mechanistic, trauma-informed, somatically-grounded alternative that could:
- Clarify what's actually happening (survival oscillation, not mood disorder)
- Direct treatment to root cause (trauma, not just symptoms)
- Offer hope for integration, not just management
The question isn't "Is it bipolar or TSD?"
The question is: "What is the nervous system trying to survive, and how do we help it realize the threat has passed?"
This framework represents years of clinical observation and theoretical synthesis